The militant-vegetarian-posing-as-nutritional-big-brother CSPI were (shockingly) allowed to comment on this story about the amount of calories in a a medium popcorn and soda combo at your local theater. The grand total of this dynamic duo, 1610 calories and 60 grams of saturated fat, is certainly excessive for anyone in one sitting. However, let’s play this game called “math,” shall we? Continue reading
I’m a fan of a hormonally adequate environment for health and fitness. By this, I mean that all hormones should be in a normal physiological range. Point of fact, if one was to believe the claims of supplement hucksters, all the cortisol in our body should be destroyed, when in reality only excessively high levels over a long period of time (chronically high vs. acutely high) should be of concern.
Growth hormone. GH. Maximize GH output and you should grow muscle and reduce bodyfat, right? Given a certain metabolic environment GH is certainly going to do its job promoting lipolysis and protein synthesis. But there is a limit to theses effects, especially with regard to direct manipulation without injection. More on that later, but first I have a question: if injecting GH to supra-physiological levels doesn’t do anything, why worry about elevating it post workout?
I was recently re-listening to the discussion between Charles Staley and Arthur De Vany. In typical cock-hole bravado, I went and found studies that refuted the notion of fasted state workouts expressing genetic adaptations favorable to hypertrophy. However, there is a line at the end of the interview that I really like. Staley quoted Art in saying:
We should recognize the limits of knowledge and get on the path that favors better outcomes.
I like this for a host of reasons.
After having read Fooled by Randomness, already knowing the stories we tell ourselves about factors we can’t possibly know (or simultaneous juggle in our grey matter accurately), the “limits of knowledge” aspect range loudly. So from a health perspective, you greatly improve your odds, or rather minimize your black swans, by eating mostly whole foods in their natural packaging (as Clarence Bass would say). And since it’s about what you’re doing most of the time, the occasional folly isn’t going to destroy what you’ve built.
You won’t find the perfect routine. Or the perfect diet. Or the perfect supplement regime. While it’s great to really research the ins and outs, it’s really easy to get mired in minutia. On top of cramming your brain with every increasing amounts of information that only fractionally improve your total “knowledge” on the subject, you run the risk of second guessing your routine. Routine jumping and diet jumping are very common ways to spin your wheels and I think most of it would be avoided by establishing a routine and then getting the hell away from the internet or other ways of second guessing what you’re doing! If you’re making progress, let that run the course and only look to make changes when things require change.
After my first ever successful diet, I fell into obsessive behavior. This was not a new manifestation, as I would readily throw myself into my interests with ferocity. However, when you’re dealing with a relationship like food, it really can be too much. When I see people posting their every meal of every day on twitter, I can’t help but think of a Brad Pilon quote:
If food were a person, you would have divorced a long time ago.
In short, care about what you eat but obsession will lead to rebound behaviors or social isolation because you can’t control your food. Just. Perfectly. All. The. Time.
So what’s the point? The favorable path isn’t perfect: it’s good enough for most situations. Being good enough all of the time, the favorable path, is the way not only to health, but also to just about anything else you’re seeking to achieve in life. Avoid perfectionism, be consistently favorable.